Methods · From Understanding to Intervention: Safety Applications of Mechanistic Interpretability

Concept Erasure via PISCES

Survey sections: §13.2.1 Concept Erasure via PISCES · §13.2.1 Stage 1 – Feature Disentanglement and Identification · §13.2.1 Stage 2 – MLP Vector and Feature Selection · §13.2.1 Stage 3 – Concept Removal · §13.2.1 Result

Summary PISCES (Precise In-parameter Suppression for Concept EraSure) is a concept-erasure method that edits model parameters in three stages, aiming to remove a target concept rather than only suppress its expression, as conventional unlearning techniques do.

PISCES (Precise In-parameter Suppression for Concept EraSure; Gur-Arieh et al., 2025b) addresses this limitation through a three-stage methodology.

Assumptions and requirements

Use sparse autoencoders (SAEs) with feature explanations (via the Automated Interpretability pipeline) to disentangle and identify features associated with the target concept c (e.g., “biological toxins”)

Evaluation considerations

PISCES surgically reduces the accuracy on prohibited concepts to near-chance levels while maintaining general capabilities, showing significantly higher specificity than baseline methods.

Intended applications

Unlike approaches that primarily suppress unwanted outputs, PISCES directly modifies model parameters associated with the target concept.

Limitations

Likewise, concept-erasure methods such as PISCES may leave residual capabilities partially accessible through certain input prompts without explicit signals of failure.

Related methods

Compare side by side →

Used in safety applications

Key papers

Cited in §13.2.1.

Also discussed in: §13.2 Concept Erasure and Knowledge Editing · §13.7.2 Silent Failure Modes · §13.5 Choosing Appropriate Methods for Different Safety Applications

Other methods in From Understanding to Intervention: Safety Applications of Mechanistic Interpretability

Knowledge Editing via Localisation (ROME, MEMIT) · Mechanistic Monitoring